Starting with the 5th edition, the definition driver was phased out, although it is still in effect. The 5th edition deleted the first half of the definition see below: The revised code of the Washington definition of “motor vehicle” defined by the code is below, this RCW only partially defines the motor vehicle, it is not the complete definition, and since it is not the complete definition, this RCW is prima facie, Now let`s look at the prima facie definition: Black`s Law Dictionary (a secondary source of law) from the 1st edition to the 4th revised edition reveals the legal definition of “driver” and is supported by case law: some commercial vehicles are excluded from this definition and others are not, but non-commercial vehicles such as passenger cars are certainly included. . under both definitions is a bunch of letters, numbers and symbols arranged, these are the state`s sessional laws abbreviated, in these sessional laws rests the first Washington State Motor Vehicle Code of 1915 in abbreviated form as “party; 1915 c 142 § 2” (as well as other laws of session), just before seeing 1915, it was first called “party”. Let us now read the code`s prima facie definition of motor vehicles and we will see that it does not distinguish between commercial and private use, nor does it mention an automobile. Perhaps the term “occupied” causes confusion, as the Sovcits claim that they do not drive if they do not do so in a commercial capacity. Thus, according to blacks, “employee” means both the act of doing something and being under the orders of a contractor to do it. “Unless you`re under the orders of a contractor to do it, you can still get a job by just doing one thing. Scroll down to question #17 just below is the definition of driver as we literally have it below: The above law (46.30.010) is indeed correct and legal, it is a privilege to drive/drive a “motor vehicle” on highways. We need to know the definition of what a motor vehicle is and understand the language of the courts to fully understand why it is true. Next, we will look at RCW 46.98.020, which essentially states that Title 46 Motor Vehicles and Title 47 Highways and Transportation must in fact be interpreted as a chapter with other related laws scattered in different locations, such as Title 81 Transport in the RCW and Title 308 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING of the Washington Administrative Code, see below: I couldn`t find Conducting`s definition of a black, but a Google search shows many definitions, including “being in control of”. Under New York State law, for example, the definition of any of these terms does not imply trade or exclude non-commercial concerns: I think when Black`s Dictionary uses the word “busy” in reference to conduct, they use it to mean “used.” As in “The Fool Used Really Weird Arguments to Make His Case.” They usually mix this definition of black law with the interstate trade clause to get the desired answer. The ICC notes that only commercial vehicles can be targeted by security patrols (think weighing stations, etc.) for highway law enforcement, so they mix “busy” with “you can`t stop me, I`m not a professional,” and that`s their presumed justification.
Here, I suspect that the PO has found the definition section of a U.S. federal law that regulates commercial traffic in interstate commerce. Obviously, those terms would be defined in such a law in the context of commercial transportation. This does not mean that the same meanings are applied in other laws. Driver`s licenses and other traffic and motor vehicle regulations are largely matters of state law in the United States. Definitions in a federal law, or even any law other than that state`s motor vehicle law (or anything a particular state calls such a body) simply won`t be relevant. The argument set out in the question simply does not follow. Let us now look at Chapter 82 DRIVER TRAINING SCHOOLS in Title 46 MOTOR VEHICLES, Section 280 is the definition of the Chapter and Subsection (6) is “Driver Training School”, which is specifically defined as a commercial driving school. SEE BELOW: Unable to use a dictionary to create a legal case. Unless your case revolves around the definition of “is.” That`s pretty much the case, the Muppets deliberately misinterpret the term “trade.” It`s also no surprise that they fail to read what this section is about and what definitions it uses. It`s very funny.
Steve Lehto has made a wonderful video that explains it from the point of view of a lawyer. The online version is only version 2, I believe, because it has gone into the public domain. The current version is 10 and has changed the definition to remove the part used. Now that we know what prima facie is, let`s look at the definition of motor vehicle from the code (RCW 46.04.320). Together, the two acts under RCW 46.04.190 FOR HIRE VEHICLE and RCW 46.04.320 MOTOR VEHICLE form the legal definition of “motor vehicle” in Washington State. Note RCW 46.04.320 is prmia facie without interpreting it with RCW 46.04.190. In summary: Driving a car means “.. Driving a bus, car, wagon or other vehicle ……. Whether you are commercially active or not does not matter. If you drive a car – under control – you are driving and therefore need a driver`s license. RCW 46.25.050 Commercial driver`s license required – exceptions, limitations, reciprocity.
1. Drivers of commercial vehicles shall obtain a commercial driving licence in accordance with this Chapter. Except when you drive with a valid commercial study permit and a valid driver`s license accompanied by the holder of a commercial driving license valid for the vehicle to be driven, no person may drive a commercial vehicle unless the person owns and is in direct possession of a commercial driver`s license and the particulars applicable to the vehicle he drives: are valid. . . .