In addition to bringing prestige, the role of the editorial staff is to advise and support the publisher. Features may include: Discussion of unpublished works: Manuscripts are sent for review provided that all unpublished data cited therein is properly credited and the appropriate permission has been obtained. If licensed data is cited, authors must provide written assurance at the time of submission that they will comply with the authors` data license agreements. Sometimes a freelancer has to hire a freelancer to produce a graphic design or other work that gets their own copyright from the creator by default. To ensure that a publishing partner has the necessary rights to use this work, we provide a sample “Work for Hire” agreement that can be used with freelancers: Second question: You (the EnPress editor) have sent me an “Editorial Board Membership Agreement” and mentioned somewhere in this document: “By this Agreement, you acknowledge and agree: that all ideas and improvements you have designed in the execution of your service are the property of the publisher”. I do not understand exactly what they mean! Can anyone describe the meaning of this sentence? What service provided by me will be their property? We recommend that authors be allowed to retain copyright in their work, as the terms of the license in these agreements are so broad that the journal or book series can use the work in the future, even without the copyright owner. Who exactly is the “Publishing Partner”? If a series or journal is sponsored by a society, organization or scientific center, that organization will be designated as a publication partner and a representative of that organization will sign the agreement. However, many journals are actually run entirely by scientists without being legally registered. In such a case, it is useful that participating scientists can legally incorporate or that an institution can assume legal responsibility for the journal. Alternatively, a publisher may assume full responsibility for the journal and be appointed as a publishing partner. In cases where Michigan Publishing publishes a series or journal, our “publishing partner” – the journal`s editorial board or series publisher – acts as an intermediary between Michigan Publishing and the authors. Therefore, for each work to be published, two agreements must be signed: one in Section B and the other in Section C.
The editorial board of a journal may compromise its quality, so editors should consider the following: Researchers are invited to respond to media requests in response to a pre-publication or conference presentation by providing an explanation or clarification of the work or information about its context. In these circumstances, media coverage will not impede the editorial processing of the submission. All manuscripts submitted to a collection are evaluated according to the standard editorial criteria of scientific reports and are subject to all standard guidelines for journals. An article processing fee will be charged upon acceptance of the publication (with the standard waiver policy). Perhaps the most controversial aspect of a CSAE-compliant agreement from the publisher`s perspective is the ability to distribute the publisher`s version of the article after a six-month embargo. I wouldn`t be married to that six-month issue. That provision would be the first thing to negotiate by extending the duration of the embargo — to one year, two years or even five years. But sticking to a limited embargo period for the distribution of the publisher`s version is a good idea, if only to serve as a precedent for the idea. As soon as the journal has committed to allowing the distribution of the publisher`s version after a certain period of time, the respective embargo period can be shortened over time. We recommend that editorial collectives (such as S-Corporation or LLC) be formed if they do not already exist as a legal entity. A lawyer should not be required for a group of people to settle in a U.S.
state; A librarian in your state can refer you to the appropriate forms. We recognize that some authors may be bound by confidentiality agreements. In such cases, the publishing team will conduct further research instead of individual disclosure instead of individual disclosure and may, in its sole discretion, ask authors to state in the online version: “Authors state that they are bound by confidentiality agreements that prevent them from disclosing their financial interests in this work.” If a work has more than one author and the copyright in the work is not transferred exclusively to the publisher, the law requires the consent of only one of the authors. (This is not the case with exclusive transfers.) However, as a courtesy and to avoid conflicts of interest, Michigan Publishing`s non-exclusive agreements require that all authors be informed of certain actions. Competing interests Dr. X`s work was developed by A. He has received compensation as a member of B`s Scientific Advisory Board and holds shares in the company. He also advised for C and received compensation. Dr.
Y and Dr. Z do not declare a potential conflict of interest. Manuscripts submitted to an open invited collection may be considered unfit for inclusion, especially if they do not fall within the scope of the collection. In such cases, the authors are informed by the publishers and their manuscript can be considered as a regular submission of scientific reports. Signed agreements should be sent by e-mail as attachments, by fax (+1 734 615 1540) or by post to the following address: Certain conditions of our agreement are in addition to and not form part of the main agreement, either because we expect the conditions contained therein to be updated more frequently, or because they are optional. Members of the scientific report writing committee are required to indicate any interest that influences their editorial activities or that could be perceived as influencing them. In particular, they should exclude themselves from manuscript publishing in the event of a financial or other conflict of interest. This may include – but is not limited to – having previously published with one or more of the authors and sharing the same institution as one or more of the authors.
Michigan Publishing avoids acquiring copyrights and prefers that our authors or publishing partners (scientific societies, journal publishers, series publishers) retain them and simply grant Michigan Publishing the right to publish the content online. We do not claim copyright in a compilation if there is another party (often a publisher or publishers) who owns that copyright more appropriately. Our philosophy is explained below. There are two types of practices that the Harvard memo calls into question: it explicitly mentions journal pricing practices and implicitly raises copyright issues in its recommendations. Scientific participants in journals (editorial board members, reviewers) may wish to discuss both types of practices with their editors. I have recommendations for both. If you would like to join the editorial board of a journal, find the journal and contact the editor via the editorial board entries page. Here is my candidate recommendation to ensure that a subscription magazine has good rights practices.
You (and ideally your fellow editors) provide a copy of the Science Commons Delayed Access (SCDA) addendum to the publisher. .